Allocations and Job Accounting
- The Basics
- Choosing the Account to Use
- The Two-Tier Allocation Account System and the Replenishing Process
- Monitoring Usage
The Basics of Allocations and Job Accounting
As an user of the cluster you have access to at least one allocation
account, the one belonging to the project which requested your access to the
HPC cluster. Some projects have normal and high-priority allocations, and
some users are in/have access to allocations from more than one project. You
can see which allocations you have access to with the
All jobs that are submitted are associated with an account; this can be
specified with the
-A flag when the job is submitted, or will
use the submitter's default account.
For more information on
specifying the account, or changing your default account.
With the exception of jobs in the
the CPU time for running your job (multiplied by the number of processor cores
consumed) will be charged to that allocation.
scavenger partition jobs are ultra-low priority and can be
preempted, we do not charge for CPU time on that partition.) The charges
are in terms of Service Units, typically abbreviated as
SU, with 1 SU = 1 hour of walltime on a CPU-core. So for
a 3 hour job running on all the cores of a node with 2 processors and 8
cores/processor, the cost would be 3 hours * 2 processors * 8 cores/processors
or 48 SU.
You are charged for cores consumed, not used. I.e., if you request 1 core on a node, but also request no other jobs be run on the node, you will be charged for ALL cores on the node assigned, since no one else can use them while your job is running. See for more information.
Although the account does not get debited until the job finishes, the
scheduler keeps track of all jobs running against a given account, and keeps
track of how many SUs are required to complete these jobs (using the
requested when the job was submitted). Before a new job charging against that
account is started, the scheduler makes sure that there are sufficient funds
to complete it AND all currently running jobs charging against that account.
If there are, the job can be started; otherwise, it is left in the pending
state with a reason code
Groups can get allocations in one of several ways:
- If the group contributed equipment into the cluster, they get a normal and high-priority accounts as part of a paid "co-op" allocation.
- If the group did not contribute equipment into the cluster, the group can submit a proposal, and if the proposal is approved by the HPC Allocations and Advisory Committee (AAC), they group will be granted an one-time AAC grant allocation.
- At some point, it will be possible to purchase SUs from the AAC. This will behave much like the one-time AAC grant allocations; the only real difference is that you provide an FRS number to charge against instead of submitting a proposal.
Paid "co-op" Allocations
Groups which contribute funds for hardware for the cluster will typically get a paid "co-op" allocation. Unlike the "condo" models that many other institutions grant, in the "co-op" model you do not get certain nodes assigned to you. Instead, you get a share in the entire cluster. The amount of computing power (in SUs or CPU-core-hours per quarter) of the contributed hardware is calculated, and (after a 20% overhead, which includes all scheduled and unscheduled downtime of the nodes), this base allotment is provided as funds in your accounts.
Co-op allocations get two accounts, for a project named PROJECT there will be a normal-priority allocation PROJECT and a high-priority allocation PROJECT-hi. As the name implies, jobs submitted with the high-priority allocation will be preferentially scheduled over jobs using the normal-priority allocation. (With two exceptions: Jobs in the scavenger partition are not charged for, and always run at ultra-low priority. Jobs in the debug partition always run at a high-priority, but these are severely time constrained.) Both co-op accounts also get the ability to run jobs for extended lengths of time; other accounts cannot run jobs for more than 3 days, but jobs charged against co-op accounts can avail themselves of the *-extended QOSes and run for up to 7-14 days depending on the number of nodes required.
The two accounts are replenished quarterly/monthly. The normal-priority account is replenished quarterly, to the base allotment described above. The high-priority account is then filled from the normal priority account every month, to one-third of this base allotment. So every month, you get the monthly allotment (1/3 of the base quarterly allotment) of your contribution available for use with high-priority. But you can also use your normal-priority allotment, effectively borrowing time from future or past months in the quarter, if you have a temporary surge in your need for computing power.
This is generally to your benefit over the traditional "condo" model; in that model you get access to the nodes your funds have purchased, but only to those nodes and nothing else. So if you bought 3 nodes, you can never run a job requiring more than 3 nodes (except by buying additional nodes). But in the co-op model, you could run a 9 node job if desired, albeit for only a third of the time that you could run 3 node jobs. And even if you never need more than your 3 nodes for a single job, you could also run three 3-node jobs simultaneously in the co-op model. Again, not for the entire month/quarter, but for a while. This might come in handy when your demand for CPU power is not steady over the course of the quarter; e.g. if there is a conference in the middle of the quarter, you might want to use up most of your entire quarter's allotment in preparation for it, even if that leaves you underfunded for the rest of the quarter.
The HPC Allocations and
Advisory Committee (AAC) can grant one-time unpaid allocations to faculty
and students for small projects, classes, feasibility tests, etc. These
allocations are granted out of computing resources purchased by funds from
the Division of Information Technology. Jobs
submitted with these allocations run at normal priority (unless submitted
scavenger partition, which runs all jobs
at ultra-low priority, or short jobs submitted to the
Choosing the Account to Use
If you only have a single account (check with the
command), you can skip this section. You only have the one account, so
there is nothing to choose.
If you have multiple accounts due to your membership in multiple groups, you may wish to choose which account you use based on your job. I.e., if the job is doing something for group A, you probably should only submit it using one of the group A accounts, even if you also have access to group B accounts. If the research areas of the two groups overlap, you will need to follow what ever group-specific policies may exist (contact your colleagues).
If you have access to normal and high-priority accounts, you probably want to submit the job to the high-priority account. These are replenished monthly, and funds do not carry over, so you might as well use it.
Of course, you need to ensure that the account you choose has sufficient
funds for your job. If when your job is about to start running there are
not sufficient funds to cover its expected cost (based on the amount of
walltime you requested for
your job will not
run and instead be left in a pending state (with reason
AssociationJobLimit) until such time as funds are available.
Because the account does not get debited until a job finishes, this
calculation of sufficient funds takes into consideration the balance in the
account as well as the expected funds required for completion not only of the
job you are submitting, but ALL currently running jobs charging against the
same account. Again, this is based on the walltimes requested with the
jobs, and is another reason why accurately specifying walltime is important.
Note that the queuing system will NOT automatically select another account, if for example your high-priority account is depleted but funds exist in your normal-priority account. The job will just get deferred.
Note also that others in your group may have access to the same account, so just because funds were there when you submitted a job, someone else's jobs may have started since then and may reduce the funds in the account.
See here for more information about specifying the account to be charged when submitting a job.
The Two-Tier Allocation Account System and the Replenishing Process
Campus units that contributed funds toward the equipment in the cluster receiving two-tiered "co-op" allocations. Unlike "condo" style accounting in some clusters, these "co-op" allocations give you access to a certain amount of compute power, but do not limit your computations to the actual hardware contributed. For example, if your unit contributed the equivalent of a 20 core node, that would be 2184 hours/quarter * 20 CPU-cores = 43.68 kSU/qu. Unlike typical "condo" scenarios wherein you would have exclusive access to that one 20 core node, but no access to any other nodes, the "co-op" model gives you greater flexibility. You can use you 43.68 kSU throughout the quarter over basically the entire cluster. You can, as in the standard "condo" model, continually run one 20 core job throughout the quarter, but you could also run jobs requiring 100 cores for up to 20% of the time, as long as the total SUs consumed fall within your allotment.
This section deals only with these "co-op" style allocations, which as previously mentioned are granted to campus units that have contributed funds toward the cluster. Allocations awarded from the Allocations and Advisory Committee (AAC) do not get replenished and only receive standard priority allocation accounts. For allocations that are not "co-op" style, accounts, jobs will deplete funds in the account until the account runs out of funds, or the time limit for the project, etc. for which the account was granted by the HPC Allocations and Advisory Committee expires and the account is deleted.
Co-op allocations consist of two-tiered allocation accounts and get refreshed on a quarterly and monthly basis. The allocation gets a quarterly quota of SUs proportional to the computational resources contributed to the cluster, which gets divided into two allocations accounts, a standard priority allocation account (which normally has the same name as the project itself), and a high-priority allocation account (which has a "-hi" suffix appended to the name of the standard priority allocation account). Jobs charged against the high-priority allocation account will take precedence over standard priority jobs while waiting in the queue to be started. Note that the increased precedence is ONLY while the jobs are in the queue, once a standard priority job starts running in the standard partition, it will not be preempted by a high priority job (on the Deepthought clusters, only jobs in the scavenger partition are subject to preemption).
The main replenishment process for co-op allocations occurs on the start of the quarter (1 Jan, 1 Apr, 1 Jul, or 1 Oct). At this time, all usage and SUs for the co-op allocation from the previous quarter goes away, and the allocation receives its quarterly allotment of SUs. This allotment is divided between the high-priority and standard priority allocation accounts, with the high-priority allocation account getting 1/3 of the quarterly SUs (e.g. one month's worth), and the remaining 2/3 going into the standard priority allocation account.
A smaller, secondary refresh occurs at the start of months which do not start the quarter. At this time, SUs will be transferred from the standard priority allocation account into the high-priority allocation account to "top it off", that is, to bring it back to 1/3 of the quarterly allotment for the allocation as a whole. This is assuming there are sufficient SUs in the standard priority allocation account to do so; if not whatever SUs are available are transferred and the standard priority allocation is left empty. NOTE: no additional SUs are granted to the allocation in these monthly refreshes; it is merely a promotion of standard priority SUs to high priority SUs. Note also that your high priority allocation account does NOT go above 1/3 of the quarterly allotment --- if you did not consume all of your high priority SUs in the previous month of the quarter, you do not get extra high priority SUs in the next month. However, fewer SUs will be transfered from the standard priority allocation account, so you will have more standard priority SUs (allowing you to sort of "borrow" SUs from previous months in the quarter).
Although the above scheme is a little complicated, it allows for better flexibility in using your SUs. What it basically amounts to is that you can use 1/3 of your quarterly allotment each month as high priority SUs. However, if in a given month you need to run more jobs than would fit in that 1/3 of your quarterly allotment, you can run them at standard priority. Those jobs run at standard priority will effectively be "borrowing" SUs from either past or future months in the quarter. If in previous months of the current quarter you did fully consume your high priority SUs, the unused time is available (as standard priority SUs) to be used in later months within the same quarter. If there are insufficient SUs from the underutilization of your high priority allocation from previous months in the current quarter (e.g. it is the first month of the quarter or you fully used your high priority SUs in the previous months), you can still consume standard priority SUs to run more than 1/3 of your quarterly SU allotment, but this will be "borrowing" from future months --- in this case, you will not have to use less than the 1/3 of your quarterly alottment of SUs per month in future months of the quarter.
To help explain this, an example is in order. Consider an allocation
foo which has a quarterly allotment of 300 kSU/qu.
- On Jan 1, the standard priority account
foowill get 200 kSU, and the high priority account
foo-hiwill get 100 kSU.
- Over the course of January, the members of foo submitted exactly 100 kSU
of high priority jobs (and no standard priority jobs). Thus at the end
foostill has 200 kSU,
foo-hihas 0 kSU.
- On 1 Feb, the monthly refresh occurs, and 100 kSU are transferred from
foo-hi, leaving 100 kSU in
foo-hiback up to 100 kSU.
- Over the course of February, the members of foo again consume exactly
100 kSU of high priority SUs, and no standard priority SUs. Therefore, at
the end of the month,
foostill have 100 kSU, and
foo-hiis once again at 0.
- On 1 Mar, the final monthly refresh of the quarter occurs, and again
100 kSU is transferred from
foo-hi. Thus we are left with
foohaving 0 kSU and
foo-hiagain back at 100 kSU.
- During March, the members of foo only consume 80 kSU, from
foois empty. So at end of the month,
foois still empty and
foo-hihas 20 kSU.
- On 1 Apr, a quarterly refresh is done. All remaining SUs from the previous
quarter are gone (e.g. the 20 kSU in
foo-hiis deleted), and the allocation starts anew, with
fooset to 200 kSU and
foo-hito 100 kSU.
- April is a light month of members of foo, and they only submit 20 kSU
of high priority jobs (and no standard priority). At the end of the month,
foostill has 200 kSU, and
foo-hihas 80 kSU.
- On 1 May, the monthly refresh occurs. 20 kSU are transferred
foo-hi, so we are left with 180 kSU in
fooand 100 kSU in
foo-hi. (Note that
foo-hidoes not go above 100 kSU, but the 80 kSU that was not used from April end up as extra in
- May is crunch time for the foo group, and they need to do 200 kSU of
calulations, or double their nominal monthly allotment, in order to prepare for a conference at the beginning of June. They submit 100 kSU
of high priority jobs, depleting that allocation account for the month, and
in addition they submit 100 kSU of standard priority jobs. So at the end
of May, the
fooallocation has 80 kSU left, and
foo-hiis depleted (0 kSU).
- On 1 Jun, the second monthly refresh occurs, and we try to bring
foo-hiback up to 100 kSU. But there are only 80 kSU in
foo, so we cannot do that. Instead, all 80 kSU from
fooare transferred to
foo-hi, leaving 0 kSU in
fooand 80 kSU in
- What happened? In May, the group used more than their monthly allotment, indeed they used double the monthly allotment. The additional 100 kSU they needed in May (for the standard priority jobs) was effectively "borrowed" from the previous month (April) and the next month (June). Because they underutilized the high priority allocation in April, there were 80 kSU additional in the standard priority allocation for them to "borrow" in May. The remaining 20 kSU were "borrowed" from June, and resulted in the total amount of SUs available in June being 20 kSU lower than normal (i.e. 80 kSU instead of 100 kSU). But they were able to get their calculations for the conference done.
- On 1 Jul, the quarterly replenishment occurs, and the cycle starts over again. Anything left unused from the previous quarter disappears, and the allocation is replenished with 200 kSU into
fooand 100 kSU into
It is recommended that you generally use up your high-priority funds first, instead of using normal-priority funds. If you do not use them, they go away (or effectively get converted to normal priority) at the end of the month)
You and your research group are responsible for ensuring proper rationing of the funds in your account(s). Excessive use of funds for a "co-op" type of project in the first month of a quarter could result in no funds at all for the next two months in either the high-priority or standard priority allocation.
This can be deliberate and beneficial, e.g. if you have important deadlines at the end of the first month a the quarter and are willing to "borrow ahead" to get computations for that completed before the deadlines. This is an advantage of the model used by the Deepthought HPC clusters; you can use nearly 3 times the power of the computers you purchased in a single to rush out computations, at the cost of having very limitted usage the following two months (but since it is after the deadlines, that might not be important).
But if this occurs because some junior member of the group is sending an excessive number of very expensive jobs, this can be quite problematic, especially as you might not notice the impact of the errant user until too late.
The Division of Information Technology cannot tell which jobs are important and which are not, nor what is good usage of your allocation funds and what is not. If we notice seriously problematic usage (e.g. a job reserving 10 nodes but only running processes on 1 node), we will do our best to notify and instruct the relevant users. But you are responsible for monitoring your own jobs, and it behooves you to monitor jobs of other users of your allocations. We will provide the necessary tools to do such, but we strongly advise all research groups to have at least one person monitor the usage of their allocations' funds regularly to ensure there are no problems, or at least catch any problems early.
How many SUs are left in my allocation?
The first level of monitoring of your allocations is with the
sbalance command. E.g.
payerle:login-1:~>sbalance Account: test-hi (dt) Limit: 163.52 kSU Available: 163.47 kSU Used: 0.05 kSU (0.0 % of limit) Account: test (dt) Limit: 327.04 kSU Available: 325.33 kSU Used: 1.71 kSU (0.5 % of limit)
Without any arguments, it will list usage metrics for all accounts to which you have access to. The above listing is from early in the quarter for a co-op type project; note that both accounts are nearly full, and that the test account has nearly double the amount of the test-hi account. The line starting with "Used" not only gives the number of kSU used, but also the usage as the percentage of the limit. If this percentage is significantly higher than the percentage of time between now and the start of the month (for your high-priority account), or the start of the quarter (for normal-priority accounts), you might need to get concerned. I.e., if at one week into the month you see the usage on your high-priority account is over 30% of the limit, your group is burning your SUs faster than they will be renewed, and you might have some time at the end of the month with nothing in your high-priority account.
For AAC grant type accounts, there is no monthly or quarterly replenishment. The "Limit" should reflect the amount of compute time the AAC granted you, and the percentage is how much of that you have used. If the percentage used is significantly greater than the percent of your work which is complete, you should consider working on an update to your proposal to request more time.
If you are tasked with monitoring the usage of the accounts by your
colleagues in the project (or have taken said task upon yourself), you
can use the
-all flag to
sbalance to see who is
using the funds in the account. You might also wish to use the
-account flag to limit the output to a single account, e.g.:
login-1: sbalance -account test-hi -all Account: test-hi (dt) Limit: 163.52 kSU Available: 102.07 kSU Used: 61.45 kSU (37.6 % of limit) User jtl used 17.6044 kSU (28.6 % of total usage) User kevin used 13.3456 kSU (21.7 % of total usage) User payerle used 30.5000 kSU (49.6 % of total usage)
This lists the same information as before, with the addition of showing
every user who has used the account in the time period, showing not only
the number of kSU they consumed, but what percentage of the total usage for
the account. E.g., in the example above, you can see that user
payerle is using almost as much as users
jtl combined. You can add the flag
if you want to also see lines for everyone with access to the allocation but
who did not consume any time since the last refresh.
--help option to
sbalance will display
usage options, most of which were discussed above.
The time period for the usage statistics depends on the type of account and project. For co-op (replenishing) projects, it is from the start of the month. For AAC grant accounts: from the start of the project/grant.
General information about an allocation
General information about allocations you belong to can be obtained
my_projects command. This command can only
be run from the login nodes (i.e. it will not work on the compute
nodes), and provides basic information regarding allocations you belong
Usage is basically
my_projects to display information for
all allocations that you are a member of, or
my_projects ALLOCATION_NAME to display information
for a specific allocation (you can give multiple ALLOCATION_NAMEs
to list information for multiple allocations). You may also wish to include
one or two
-v for short) flags
to include more information. You can also give a
a full description of all the flags the command accepts.
Without any verbose flags, it will display the name of the allocation project, the name of the parent project (if any), and the department and college associated with the project.
With one verbose flag, it will also display the "points-of-contact" for the project, and the members of the project. the points-of-contact are the people who are authorized to add/remove members from the allocation. It will also display the base kSU level, and indicate whether the project autoreplenishes each quarter or not.
The information with two verbose flags is probably not very useful; basically a description of the project (which is usually not informative) and the over/underusage alert thresholds which determine if/when the points-of-contact are emailed regarding excessive/etc usage of their allocation (if no value is listed, a global default is used). The over/underusage thresholds are explained a bit more in the section on checking for excessive usage.
NOTE: the allocation project names are for the project.
Some projects have both a standard and high-priority allocation account;
however, they are still one project, and only one
listing will be shown in the
my_projects command. The base
kSU level is the total of the
standard and high-priority kSU at the start of the quarter.
Seeing job history
sacct command can be used to view the accounting records of jobs,
both past and currently running. It takes some time to run, and can display
a fair amount of information (which is documented in its man page). You will
almost always wish to restrict it to a time range, so to see the usage of
foo for the month of November 2014, one could use
login-1> sacct --format=JobID,User,Account,ReqCPUs,AllocCPUS,Elapsed,CPUTime \ -a -X -S 2014-11-01 -E 2014-11-30 -A foo JobID User Account ReqCPUS AllocCPUS Elapsed CPUTime ------------ --------- ---------- -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 2717747 payerle foo 16 20 1-00:00:09 20-00:03:00 2717748 payerle foo 16 20 1-00:00:09 20-00:03:00 2717749 payerle foo 16 20 1-00:00:09 20-00:03:00 2717750 payerle foo 16 20 1-00:00:08 20-00:02:40 2717751 payerle foo 16 20 1-00:00:08 20-00:02:40 2717752 payerle foo 16 20 1-00:00:08 20-00:02:40 2717753 payerle foo 16 20 1-00:00:17 20-00:05:40 2717754 payerle foo 16 20 1-00:00:17 20-00:05:40 2717755 payerle foo 16 20 1-00:00:17 20-00:05:40 2717756 payerle foo 16 20 1-00:00:12 20-00:04:00 2718384 payerle foo 10 0 00:00:00 00:00:00 2718385 payerle foo 10 0 00:00:00 00:00:00 2718386 payerle foo 10 0 00:00:00 00:00:00
- ReqCPUs is the number of cores requested
- AllocCPUs is the number of cores allocated to the job. The jobs shown were run in exclusive mode, so the full 20 cores on the node were allocated to it.
- Elapsed is the elapsed walltime for the job
- CPUTime is the elapsed walltime times AllocCPUs. This
is what is charged against the
- The last three jobs are still pending, so have not been allocated any CPUs yet, and have not accumulated any walltime (or charges).
Monitoring for excessive usage
An important aspect of managing the usage of an allocation is ensuring that SUs are being consumed at a reasonable rate. The system intentionally allows flexibility in the rate in which SUs are consumed; e.g. if you have a major conference in the middle of a quarter, you might wish to (and can) use up most or all of your allocated funds for a quarterly replenishing allocation in the first month of the quarter, leaving (almost) nothing left for the remaining two months of the quarter. If that is your intent and desire (and the rest of the users of this allocation agree with you), all is well. However, if a few profligate users consume most of the quarterly allocation in the first month without the consent of the rest of the users of the allocation, there is a major problem.
From the system's point of view, the two examples above will look the same --- the SUs were consumed at an excessive rate in the first month of the quarter. We cannot tell if that was done for a good reason or by mistake by inexperienced users --- that is a judgement call which the points-of-contact (PoCs) of the allocation will need to make. What we can do is try to alert the PoCs when something like that appears to be happening, and hopefully early enough that if it is happening improperly that behaviors can be adjusted before this leads to serious problems.
NOTE: the following only applies to quarterly auto-replenishing allocations. Non-replenishing allocations (e.g. allocations granted by the AAC on the Deepthought HPC clusters and Engineering Startup Allocations (i.e. allocations whose names start with "esu-")) are not currently supported by the tools described below. Since they do not auto-replenish, you can use the sbalance command described previously to see how much of the total allocation has been consumed, and compare that to your estimates of the amount of work needed to complete the project.
check_project_usage compares the fraction of
the allocation's quarterly allotment that has been consumed in the current
quarter to the fraction of the quarter that has gone by. If the fraction
of SUs used exceeds the point
in the quarter by more than a certain threshold, it will flag that allocation
as having unsustainable usage. (It also similarly checks for significant
underusage, but the default threshold for that is such as to never flag
underusage). The global default overusage threshold is 15 percentage points;
PoCs can request different default thresholds for a specific allocation (just
send email to firstname.lastname@example.org requesting
such; this will change the defaults used in the automated mail as well), and
anyone can specify thresholds on the command line as well. E.g., if we are
one third of the way into the quarter (i.e. one month into the quarter) and
50% of the allocation has been used, and alert will be raised using the global
default threshold (as 33% + 15% = 48% < 50%) . If a threshold of 20% was to
be used, no alert would be raised (as 33% + 20% = 53% > 50%).
By default, the
check_project_usage command will check all
allocations for which you are a member for excessive usage. If one or more
allocations appear to be being consumed at an unsustainable rate, it will
print usage information and warnings for that allocation. If no excessive
usage is detected, normally it will not print anything.
(NOTE: if you are a member of non-replenishing allocations
as well, you will get a brief warning stating that the code is skipping
the non-replenishing allocation.)
You can provide the
-h flags to get
full usage information. You can specify allocation project names on the
command line to only check the named allocations (NOTE:
these are allocation project names, so should not include the
suffix; because the standard and high-priority balances are linked, it checks
both simultaneously.) You can also give the
-v flag, which will cause usage information to be displayed
even if no over/underusage condition was flagged.
login-1> check_project_usage Project: testproj1 Time: 2016 Oct 14 Overquota Threshold: 15.0% Underquota Threshold: 100.0% ------ TimePeriod (percent into) Allocation Available PctUsed HiPriority month ( 43.7% into) 67.500 kSU 15.858 kSU 76.5% Total quarter ( 14.7% into) 202.500 kSU 125.970 kSU 37.8% *** Excessive rate of consumption for HiPriority! *** Excessive rate of consumption for Total! login-1> login-1> check_project_usage -v Project: testproj1 Time: 2016 Oct 14 Overquota Threshold: 15.0% Underquota Threshold: 100.0% ------ TimePeriod (percent into) Allocation Available PctUsed HiPriority month ( 43.7% into) 67.500 kSU 15.858 kSU 76.5% Total quarter ( 14.7% into) 202.500 kSU 125.970 kSU 37.8% *** Excessive rate of consumption for HiPriority! *** Excessive rate of consumption for Total! ======================================== Project: testproj2 Time: 2016 Oct 14 Overquota Threshold: 15.0% Underquota Threshold: 100.0% ------ TimePeriod (percent into) Allocation Available PctUsed HiPriority month ( 43.7% into) 60.181 kSU 53.543 kSU 11.0% Total quarter ( 14.7% into) 180.544 kSU 162.452 kSU 10.0% login-1> login-1> check_project_usage testproj2 login-1>
The first time we execute
check_project_usage above, it
displays the usage for
testproj1 with warnings of excessive
usage for both the high-priority allocation account (as 76% > 43% + 15%)
and the total allocation (as 37% > 14% + 15% ). The second run has the
verbose flag, and so in addition to showing the excessive usage for
testproj1, it also displays the usage for
even though it is not problematic (PctUsed is less than the "percent into"
the month/quarter, respectively). The final invocation does not have the
verbose flag, but specifies to only check
produces no output as there is no excessive usage condition.
If you wish to include this command in your dot files to alert you to
overusage issues whenever you log in, be sure to run it only for interactive
sessions --- not only will it needlessly slow down non-interactive shells,
but if it produces output it can mess up file transfers with scp, etc. E.g.,
tcsh users, something like:
if ( $?prompt ) then check_project_usage ... other interactive only commands if desired ... endif
If your default shell is
if [ ! "x$PS1" = "x" ]; then check_project_usage ... other interactive only commands if desired ... fi
The Division of Information Technology actually runs a similar script every few hours on every auto-replenishing allocation, and will send email to the points-of-contact for the allocation if it is flagged as being consumed at an unsustainable rate. To avoid "spamming" the points-of-contact, we will not send out email to a given user more than once every three days. In this automated case, the project specific overusage threshold is used (or the global default is not project specific threshold was set). A point-of-contact can request a change to the threshold for any of their allocations be sending an email request to email@example.com. They can similarly request a change in the minimum number of days between emails sent to them. NOTE: the thresholds are per-project/allocation, and affect alerts to all points-of-contact for that allocation. The minimum number of days between emails are per person, and affect alerts for all allocation projects that person is a point-of-contact for. Also note that limiting of the frequency of emails is applied separately to each project you are a point-of-contact for, so if you receive an alert about allocation A today, you may still receive an alert about allocation B tomorrow, but should not receive another alert about allocation A for several days.
For non-replenishing allocations, the sbalance command returns information pertaining to the usage of the allocation over the allocations lifetime. For replenishing allocations, however, most of the tools mentioned above only return data about usage for the current quarter. While this is probably what most users are concerned with most of the time (e.g., if I want to figure out if there are enough kSUs to run my job now, usage from previous quarters is irrelevant), but sometimes one needs information regarding usage over longer time scales. This is especially useful for people who manage "super-allocations".
There are a couple of tools available to get more historic information regarding allocation use:
- the XDMoD website for the Deepthought clusters
The Deepthought XDMoD website is a web page running the Open XDMoD (Open XD Metrics on Demand) web application. This can present in graphical form many metrics pertaining to the Deepthought clusters. One can see how many kSUs were consumed by a given allocation as a function of time, or what the average job length for an allocation over the past year. Some of the more advanced filtering and reporting features requires one to register for a "login account" on the XDMoD website (unfortunately, there is no easy way to tie this into our existing authentication system); you can do so from the website.
slurm-usage-report command runs from the login nodes
of either Deepthought cluster. This command examines all the job records
related to the allocation account(s) specified, and provides summaries.
(As opposed to the sacct command which lists details
for each job, but does not summarize.). Because it has to go through all
the job records, it does tend to be a bit slow.
We only discuss some of the more commonly used options below; the
command supports a
-h option which
provides more information on its usage (including some options to provide
even more usage information). The commonly used options are:
- --account=ACCOUNT: this specifies which allocation accounts should be looked at. You can specify multiple allocation accounts by either repeating this argument and/or by replacing ACCOUNT with a comma-delimited list of allocation account names. If no allocation accounts are given, it defaults to all allocation accounts for which you are either a member of a point-of-contact.
- --unit=UNIT: this specifies which unit should be used in output. The default is 'SU', but 'kSU', 'cpu-min' or even 'cpu-sec' are alternatives.
- --start=START: this specifies the start of the time-period which is being examined. By default, it defaults to the start of the current quarter, but you can specify another start time by giving a date in the YYYY-MM-DD format (or a date and time in the YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss format).
- --end=END: this specifies the end of the time-period being examined. There is no default (although see also the --timeperiod flag). If given, it uses the same format as the start time.
- --timeperiod=TIMEPERIOD: this is an alternative way of specifying the end of the time-period being examined. It should not be used if the --end flag was used. It defaults to 'quarter', but 'day', 'week', 'month', and 'year' are also valid options.
- --machine-parsable: If this flag is given, the output produces is in a delimiter-separated-values format, using a pipe ('|') character as the delimiter. This is useful if you do further processing on the output, e.g. in a spreadsheet.
- --noheaders: If this flag is given, the normal header text is not printed. This might be useful when using --machine-parsable.
- --byuser: Normally the script summarizes usage at the allocation account level, but if this flag is given the information is presented by user and allocation account.
slurm_jobstats_for_alloc also prints information about
usage of allocations on the Deepthought cluster, but is generally more
geared toward assisting managers of superallocations determine which
suballocations have and have not been using the cluster. By default, it
will print out for each allocation account the following information (for
the specified timeperiod):
- the total number of jobs charged against that allocation account run during the specified time period
- the total number of CPU-cores allocated for jobs for that allocation account
- the total number of SUs charged against that allocation account during the specified period.
- the date and job number of the first job run against that allocation account in the time period.
- the date and job number of the last job run against that allocation account in the time period.
We only discuss some of the more commonly used options below; the
command supports a
-h option which
provides more information on its usage (including some options to provide
even more usage information). The commonly used options are:
- --account ACCOUNT: Specifies the allocation account(s) to be examined. You can give multiple allocation accounts by repeating this argument, and/or providing a comma delimited list of accounts in place of ACCOUNT (Note: you will need to quote if the list contains spaces).
- --file FILENAME: Sometimes it is easier to give a file containing a list of allocation account names, one per line. This allows you to specify such a file.
- --treat-as-projects: Normally, the values given to
--accountargument or in the FILENAME argument are interpretted as allocation accounts. With this flag, they will be treated as project names; e.g. given ACCOUNT as 'foo' will result in getting results for 'foo' and 'foo-hi'. (NOTE: if used on an account for which there is no high priority allocation account, in conjunction with --nosuprress0 below, one might get a bogus listing for the non-existant high priority allocation)
- --start STARTDATE: Specifies the start of the timeperiod to collect statistics for. Should be given as YYYY-MM-DD or, if a specific time of day desired YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS.
- --end ENDDATE: Specifies the end of the timeperiod. Same format as STARTDATE.
- --nosuppress0: Normally, allocation accounts for which no jobs were found are elided from output. Use this if you wish to see them.
- --machine-parsable: This will generate output in a delimiter-separated-values format, using a pipe ('|') character as the delimiter. Useful if you want to bring the data into a spreadsheet for further analysis.
- --combine-project-allocations: Normally, output is displayed for each allocation account separately. If this flag is given, the output for 'foo' and 'foo-hi' allocation accounts are combined.